MATRIXFREEDOM INFORMATION MEMORANDUM CROWN PROPOGANDA

Simon Goldberg & Dan Neidle False Allegations, Media Smears & My Human Rights Response

Overview

Dear MATRIXFREEDOM Member,

I am aware of false and defamatory publications targeting me and MATRIXFREEDOM, published by Tax Policy Associates (operated by Dan Neidle) and matrixfreedomreview.com (run by Simon Goldberg). These publications are riddled with distortions, misinformation, and outright lies.

Let me be clear:

  • No MATRIXFREEDOM member has ever been defrauded.
  • We have hundreds of positive testimonials.
  • We are proud of the lawful and peaceful financial remedy solutions we facilitate.

What is happening is not investigative journalism — it is a coordinated Crown/FCA-backed smear campaign designed to undermine our lawful mission, discredit me personally, and discourage you from reclaiming your financial sovereignty.

Iain Clifford Exposing Crown Propaganda Information Memorandum

Iain Clifford, The Disrupter

Dan Neidle (Tax Policy Associates)

  • Background & Influence: Dan Neidle spent over two decades as head of tax at Clifford Chance, one of the UK’s largest law firms, and now advises policymakers across major governing parties. He’s a trusted voice at HM Treasury and the FCA via his nonprofit Tax Policy Associates The Times+7Wikipedia+7Elysium Law+7.
  • Political and Regulator Ties: As a member of the national constitutional committee of the Labour Party and an adviser to the Scottish Government, Neidle has significant political reach. His coverage of MATRIXFREEDOM echoes FCA messaging and frames us as “scamming vulnerable people,” despite offering no evidence Tax Policy
    Associates+1Wikipedia+1.
  • Why This Matters: Someone with his connections wouldn’t expend time on a hobbyist website—especially to wage a campaign costing hundreds of hours—unless there was a coordinated objective consistent with Crown interests.

Simon Goldberg (EMPOWERTHEPEOPLE)

Who He Is: Simon Goldberg runs EMPOWERTHEPEOPLE, a rival Private Members’ Association offering similar financial remedies to MATRIXFREEDOM. He’s heavily promoted this channel across multiple platforms—YouTube, Facebook, X, Instagram—for four years, producing hundreds of hours of critical content.

Key Issues:

  • He lacks formal qualification or regulatory oversight for financial advice.
  • His content includes unverified “customer complaints” and repetitive attacks — without any right of reply or verification — designed to target us systematically.
  • Given the level of effort (thousands of hours), this appears more than a private grievance, suggesting external encouragement or funding.

Why This Patterns Matters

  • Easily disproven: No evidence supports Neidle or Goldberg’s assertions. We have hundreds of satisfied member testimonials, no consumer complaints, and consistent member backing.
  • They haven’t targeted any other similar associations — only MATRIXFREEDOM.
  • This reeks of state-linked character assassination: politically well- connected voices more effectively erode trust than any random online critic could.
  • At best it’s private arm’s-length defamation; at worst, covert Crown proxy activity facilitating reputational warfare.

Strategic Context for Members

This is not happenstance. Rather, it’s part of a clear campaign to undermine my and MATRIXFREEDOM’s credibility:

  • Dan Neidle’s high-level regulator links provide a cloak of legitimacy
  • Simon Goldberg’s relentless posting suggests discrete backing or funding
  • Both act as reputational shock troops, reinforcing FCA’s broader legal suppression
  • The Civil Restraint Order blocks any UK legal cleansed of these smears, forcing us into raising this with the European Court of Human Rights

Why I Cannot Challenge Them in UK Courts

In 2023, I was subjected to a General Civil Restraint Order (GCRO) — a legal gagging tool that prevents me from bringing any civil claim in the UK courts without prior judicial permission. This means:

  • I am legally barred from suing Dan Neidle or Simon Goldberg for defamation.
  • I cannot defend my name or MATRIXFREEDOM’s reputation through the normal judicial channels.
  • The UK courts have denied me access to justice — a basic human right.

Turning to the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR)

Since the UK system has shut its doors to me, I am taking this matter to the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) in Strasbourg.

We are including the defamatory attacks by Neidle and Goldberg in our human rights complaint, on the following grounds:

ECHR Article Violation
Article 6 Denial of fair trial – I am barred from accessing courts to protect my name
Article 8 Right to private and professional life – damaged by false public attacks
Article 13 No effective remedy in UK courts to defend against these lies
Protocol 1, Article 1 Loss of economic opportunity due to reputational sabotage

My Position – Backed by Facts

  • MATRIXFREEDOM has never been proven to cause harm to any member.
  • We have video and written testimonials from members all over the world.
  • We provide detailed information and lawful remedy pathways — not scams.
  • The defamatory content published online is not supported by evidence, and is being used to prejudice public opinion in parallel with FCA litigation.

Final Note

This is bigger than just an attack on me — it is an attack on the truth, on you, and on the right to pursue lawful financial remedy outside the corporate banking MATRIXFREEDOM. We will not be silenced. We will not back down. And we will not stop defending your right to live free from financial tyranny. Watch the disrupter documentary coming soon here www.thedisrupter.live
Please fill out the form fields below to request an interview with Iain Clifford.