Affidavit to Support Motion To Strike Out

—————————————————————————-

AFFIDAVIT

Re MOTION TO STRIKE OUT

Order 34 2023

NOTICE TO AGENT IS NOTICE TO PRINCIPAL

——————————————————————————

IN THE CROWN COURT AT SOUTHWARK

Served Upon: JCIO, Serious Fraud Office, Public Inquiry Committee, Financial Conduct Authority, and all Parties Cited in Certificate of Service

Filed by: Iain Clifford, occupant of the office of the General Executor of the Estate known as [IAIN CLIFFORD STAMP]

AFFIDAVIT IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO STRIKE OUT

Order 34/2023 Southwark Crown Court

I, Iain Clifford, General Executor of the Estate known as [IAIN CLIFFORD STAMP], affirm the following statement of truth to provide background context to the Motion to Strike Out proceedings under Order 34/2023.

  1. INTRODUCTION

    1. This affidavit is submitted in support of the Motion to Strike Out all proceedings under Order 34/2023 on the grounds of fatal jurisdictional defects, lack of

prosecutorial standing, unrebutted affidavits, and a demonstrable pattern of regulatory abuse and judicial misconduct.

  1. LACK OF PROSECUTORIAL STANDING

    1. The Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) has failed to verify the identity, authority, or lawful delegation of “Alistair Mackenzie,” the purported prosecutor. No public record, oath of office, or delegation under POCA or FSMA exists. The use of a placeholder identity constitutes fraud by false representation under the Fraud Act 2006.

  1. UNREBUTTED AFFIDAVITS AND NOTICES

    1. All affidavits and lawful notices served upon the FCA and relevant parties remain unrebutted. Under the legal maxim “Silence is agreement” and the precedent set in Adams v Lindsell (1818), unrebutted affidavits stand as truth in law.

  1. ABSENCE OF VERIFIED CROWN AGENT

    1. Southwark Crown Court has failed to produce evidence of a Crown Agent’s presence or appointment, as required under the Crown Agent Act 1995. Without such verification, the court lacks lawful jurisdiction.

  1. JUDICIAL OATH NOT PRODUCED

    1. Judge Anthony Baumgartner has not produced his judicial oath as required under the Promissory Oaths Act 1868. This omission invalidates his authority to preside over matters involving liberty and property.

  2. JUDICIAL REFUSAL TO RECUSE

    1. Despite documented misconduct and a formal demand for recusal, Judge Baumgartner continues to preside. This constitutes a breach of natural justice and procedural fairness.

  1. NO EVIDENCE OF REGULATED FINANCIAL ACTIVITY

    1. Over 500 sworn witness statements confirm that neither [IAIN CLIFFORD STAMP] nor any MATRIXFREEDOM member has offered regulated financial services. The FCA has failed to produce any evidence to the contrary.

  1. FCA ORCHESTRATION OF FALSE FSCS PAYOUT

    1. The FCA knowingly orchestrated a false £80 million payout under the Financial Services Compensation Scheme (FSCS), wrongly attributing liability to Integrity. Integrity was never responsible for the GTEP (Guaranteed Traded Endowment Plan) structures, which were designed, funded, and administered by Bank of Scotland (HBOS).

    1. The FCA misled a Queen’s Counsel into issuing a report that formed the basis of the FSCS payout. That same QC later admitted he had been misinformed by the FCA. The true liability rested with HBOS, which had engineered the collapse of the plans by altering valuation methods and triggering defaults across thousands of investor accounts.

    1. This fraudulent attribution of liability to Integrity was used to justify the FCA’s censure of the firm and to initiate a long-standing vendetta against Iain Clifford. The FSCS payout was not only misdirected—it was a cover-up to protect HBOS and the regulatory agencies complicit in the concealment of systemic banking fraud.

    1. This section is submitted as further evidence of the FCA’s abuse of process,

regulatory misconduct, and the retaliatory nature of Order 34/2023.

  1. PUBLIC SCRUTINY AND TRANSPARENCY

    1. This case is now under increasing public scrutiny. Thousands of MATRIXFREEDOM members are actively monitoring the proceedings, and a much wider audience comprising individuals and groups questioning the integrity of the judicial process is becoming aware of the facts.

    1. The documentary series The Disrupter, along with supporting videos and webinars, is being widely disseminated to expose the institutional misconduct, regulatory overreach, and judicial failures surrounding this matter.

    1. The public interest in this case continues to grow, and all actions taken by the FCA, the judiciary, and associated parties are being documented and preserved for historical and legal record.

JURAT

I Iain Clifford, holding the office of General Executor of the [IAIN CLIFFORD STAMP] estate, a divine (holy) living spirit, born again, incarnate with life as a man under God’s law, attest and affirm that the aforementioned is true and correct, attested to and submitted by a living,

breathing, self-aware man, under God. I further acknowledge that this is an act of my free will and Deed.

I solemnly swear and affirm, under penalty of perjury, that the contents of this document are the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth.

By: Iain Clifford

Iain Clifford

3rd July Twenty Twenty-Five.

Witnesses

The undersigned witnesses hereby affirm that they personally observed Iain Clifford execute this affidavit, and that, to the best of their knowledge, the facts stated herein are true and accurate.

Witness 1

Proper Name: Andrew Michael Signature: Andrew Michael Date: 3rd July 2025

Witness 2

Proper Name: David Ayerst

Signature: David Ayerst Date: 3rd July 2025 Witness 3

Proper Name: Angela John

Signature: Angela John

Date: 3rd July 2025

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I Iain Clifford, Certify the foregoing was provided by UK Special delivery mailed to:

Office of [KEIR STARMER] The Office of Prime Minister 10 Downing Street

London SW1A 2AA

Office of [KING CHARLES III]

The Office of the King Buckingham Palace London

SW1A 1AA

Office of [RICHARD HERMER] The Office of Attorney General 102 Petty France

London SW1H 9EA

United Kingdom.

Office of [YVETTE COOPER] The Office of Secretary of State 2 Marsham Street

London SW1P 4DF

Office of [ANDREW BAILEY] The Office Bank of England Threadneedle Street

London EC2R 8AH

Office of [NIKHIL RATHI]

The Office of Chief Executive of the Financial Conduct Authority 12 Endeavour Square

London E20 1JN

Judicial Conduct Investigations Office (JCIO)

Judicial Conduct Investigations Office 3rd Floor, 10 Victoria Street

London, SW1H 0NN

Serious Fraud Office (SFO) Office of Director [LISA OSOFSKY] Serious Fraud Office

2-4 Cockspur Street London, SW1Y 5BS

Financial Conduct Authority (FCA)

FAO: Complaints Team 12 Endeavour Square London, E20 1JN

FCA Complaints Commissioner Office of [ANTONY TOWNSEND]

Office of the Complaints Commissioner 1 Horse Guards Road

London, SW1A 2HQ

Office of [DEREK ANTHONY SWEETING]

Royal Courts of Justice Strand, London

WC2A 2LL

United Kingdom

Office of [ALASDAIR MACKENZIE]

The Office of Criminal Prosecutions Team Financial Conduct Authority 12 Endeavour Square

London E20 1JN

Office of [MATTHEW STONE] The Financial Conduct Authority 12 Endeavour Square

London E20 1JN

Office of [PIETRO BOFFA] The Financial Conduct Authority 12 Endeavour Square

London E20 1JN

Office of [ANTHONY BAUMGARTEN]

The Office of Southwark Crown Court 1 English Grounds.

Southwark London SE1 2HU

Office of [DAME SUSAN ELIZABETH CARR]

The Office of Judicial Conduct Investigations Office (JCIO) 81-82 Queen’s Building

Royal Courts of Justice Strand

London WC2A 2LL

Office of [SHABANA MAHMOOD]

The Office of the Ministry of Justice 102 Petty France

London SW1H 9AJ

Office of [NICK GOODWIN]

The Office of HM Courts and Tribunals Service (HMCTS) Post Point 1.10

102 Petty France London

SW1H 9AJ

Office of [DAME VICTORIA SHARP]

The office of the Royal Courts of Justice Strand

London WC2A 2LL

Office of [DAME SARAH ELIZABETH COCKERILL]

The Office of the Royal Courts of Justice Strand

London WC2A 2LL

As per Section 196(4) of the Law of Property Act 1925 (LPA 1925) provides that: “Any notice shall also be sufficiently served if it is served by registered post or recorded delivery by virtue of section 1 of the Recorded Delivery Service Act 1962” Furthermore: Under section 127(4) of the Postal Services Act 2000 (PSA 2000) and PSA 2000, Sch 8 Pt II, paras 2–3.

Please fill out the form fields below to request an interview with Iain Clifford.