LAWFUL NOTICE TO CEASE AND DESIST

NOTICE REGARDING DECLARATION OF RESCISSION BENCH WARRANTS AND ECHR ESCALATION

Order 34/2023

NOTICE TO AGENT IS NOTICE TO PRINCIPAL NOTICE TO PRINCIPAL IS NOTICE TO AGENT

——————————————————————————–

IN THE CROWN COURT AT SOUTHWARK

Served Upon: JCIO, Serious Fraud Office, Public Inquiry Committee, Financial Conduct Authority, and all Parties Cited in Certificate of Service

Served by: Iain Clifford, occupant of the office of the General Executor of the Estate known as [IAIN CLIFFORD STAMP]

Re: Unlawful Enforcement under Order 34/2023 Served by: Iain Clifford, Living Man

Jurisdiction: United Kingdom

Bench Warrants, Jurisdictional Trespass & Escalation to the European Court of Human Rights

1. FORMAL NOTICE OF DECLARATION OF RESCISSION

   1. I, Iain Clifford, a living man and private estate holder, do hereby lawfully rescind, revoke, and nullify any and all presumptions of legal or lawful service at the following:

      1. 4C Glebe Park Avenue, Bedhampton, Havant, Hants PO9 3JR

      2. iain@mtrxf.org

      3. iain@wealthfortress.co.uk

   2. These locations are not my domicile, place of business, nor a declared address for

service. Both email addresses have been cancelled by the email account owner and 4c Glebe Park Avenue is a mere correspondence address and does not constitute an address for service as defined in law.

2. PRIOR NOTICE AND ESTOPPEL BY ACQUIESCENCE

   1. A lawful notice of rescission of service was served on or around 27 June 2025, titled “Notice of Service Confirmation, Judicial Notice of Deficiency, and Lawful Demand for Remedy”, upon:

      1. The Financial Conduct Authority (FCA)

      2. Southwark Crown Court

      3. Judicial Conduct Investigations Office (JCIO)

      4. Serious Fraud Office (SFO)

      5. FCA Complaints Commissioner

      6. Other parties at the Certificate of Service

   2. This notice was never rebutted by any party, and stands as a binding estoppel by acquiescence and tacit admission.

3. STATUTORYANDREGULATORYFOUNDATIONS

   1. The following laws and regulations confirm that no lawful service has occurred and any presumed service is void:

      1. FCA Handbook GEN 2.2.14R: Communication is not effective unless received at a valid, provided address.

      2. FCA DISP 1.3.1R: Firms must ensure communications are sent to verified addresses.

      3. Civil Procedure Rules (CPR) 6.23: Service must be to an address for service, not merely a contact address.

      4. Law of Property Act 1925, s.196(4): Service by post must be to a known residence or place of business.

      5. Postal Services Act 2000, s.127(4): Recorded delivery does not override the need for lawful service.

      6. Interpretation Act 1978, s.7: The presumption of postal service is rebuttable where no lawful address exists.

      7. Civil Jurisdiction and Judgments Act 1982: Service outside UK borders requires legal basis and consent.

4. RELEVANT CASE LAW

1. Tinkler v HMRC [2021] UKSC 39 – Silence following notice creates estoppel.

2. Anufrijeva v Southwark LBC [2003] EWCA Civ 1406 – No legal consequence can arise from unserved or undisclosed decisions.

3. Golder v UK (1975) 1 EHRR 524 – Right of access to justice requires proper notice. iv. Tatishvili v Russia (2007) – Knowledge cannot be presumed; actual service is required.

5. Kukayev v Russia (App. No. 29361/02) – Improper notice voids due process.

6. R (Bancoult) v Secretary of State [2001] QB 1067 – Service must be direct, valid, and not presumed.

7. Case Law on Service viii. Lloyds Bank plc v Howard [1990] 1 All ER 971 ix.

“An address for correspondence does not equate to an address for service unless expressly provided as such.”

x. R (on the application of D) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2006] EWCA Civ 1746 xi. “Service by substituted means must be a last

resort and must not create prejudice to the recipient’s right to fair process.”

12. Re P (a child) [2008] EWCA Civ 462

13. “Effective service requires actual or imputed knowledge and access. Purely procedural compliance is not sufficient to ground jurisdiction.”

5. DUTY TO CONFIRM RECEIPT

   1. Under CPR Part 6.37 and Practice Direction 6A, para 4.1, a party attempting service must take reasonable steps to ensure the address is current and valid:

1. 1. 1. “The FCA and Southwark Crown Court have failed to make reasonable inquiry under CPR 6.37 and PD6A 4.1 as to my lawful place of service, and cannot rely on a defective, third-party correspondence address.”

6. INTERNATIONAL AND JURISDICTIONAL LIMITATIONS

   1. I am domiciled in North Cyprus, outside of UK jurisdiction. I have not provided an address for service and do not consent to extraterritorial jurisdiction. Accordingly, any

enforcement or service attempts by the FCA or Southwark Crown Court constitute:

2. Ultra vires action

3. Trespass upon a private trust estate

4. Constructive fraud and procedural abuse

5. Violation of international comity and Article 1 Protocol 1 ECHR

7. ILLEGALITY OF SUBSTITUTED SERVICE

   1. Any substituted or alternative service (e.g. via newspaper, FCA website, or digital publication) shall be deemed:

      1. Fictitious service, lacking legal or factual standing

      2. A breach of Article 6 ECHR (fair trial) due to denied opportunity to be heard

      3. A breach of Article 13 ECHR (effective remedy)

      4. A trespass against the estate of the living man

      5. Perversion of justice under common law and constructive trust fraud

8. RIGHT TO REFUSE JURISDICTION WITHOUT CONSENT

Cite:

i. Halsbury’s Laws of England, Vol 20 (Service of Process): ii. “A defendant domiciled abroad is not bound by a UK service unless lawful jurisdiction has been accepted or conferred by treaty, statute, or consent.”

9. NOTICE REGARDING BENCH WARRANTS

   1. Any bench warrant issued against the legal fiction “[IAIN CLIFFORD STAMP]” in reliance on presumed service shall be challenged immediately and escalated to the European Court of Human Rights on grounds of:

      1. No lawful service

      2. Jurisdictional denial

      3. Violation of natural justice iv. Previous estoppel and rescission notices

   2. Such a warrant would be null and void ab initio, and any enforcement would:

1. 1. 1. Constitute malfeasance in public office

      2. Strengthen my petition under Articles 6, 8, 13, and Protocol 1, Article 1

      3. Be cited as further evidence of systemic persecution before international authorities

8. CONSTRUCTIVE TRUST FRAUD

   1. Prior affidavits and trust declarations demand that:

8. 1. 1. “Any Crown enforcement officer attempting to operate against the legal fiction without my consent is committing a constructive trust fraud under equity and trespass upon a private express trust, which is subject to private prosecution under Equity Jurisdiction and Trust Law (Lewin on Trusts, 19th Edition).”

8. ECHR REFERENCE WITH SPECIFIC MECHANISM

   1. ECHR Rule 39 interim measure would be activated:

8. 1. 1. “Due to the Civil Restraint Order and denial of access to domestic remedy, I shall submit a Rule 39 interim relief application directly to the ECHR to prevent enforcement of a defective warrant, citing imminent irreparable harm from unlawful detention.”

   2. ECHR Precedents:

8. 1. 1. Mamatkulov and Askarov v. Turkey (2005) – failure to comply with interim measures violated Article 34.

      2. Paladi v Moldova (2009) – breach of interim measure is a breach of Convention rights.

10. FINAL NOTICE

    1. All parties are formally instructed to:

1. 1. 1. Cease all service attempts at any rescinded address

      2. Acknowledge that no valid service can occur without my express written consent

      3. Due to the Civil Restraint Order issued in 2024, judicial review is not available as a remedy. Therefore, any such warrant or order will be escalated directly to the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) as a violation of:

      4. Article 6 – Right to a fair trial

      5. Article 8 – Right to private and family life

      6. Article 13 – Right to an effective remedy

      7. Protocol 1, Article 1 – Right to peaceful enjoyment of possessions

JURAT

I Iain Clifford, holding the office of General Executor of the [IAIN CLIFFORD STAMP] estate, a

divine (holy) living spirit, born again, incarnate with life as a man under God’s law, attest and affirm that the aforementioned is true and correct, attested to and submitted by a living,

breathing, self-aware man, under God. I further acknowledge that this is an act of my free will and Deed.

I solemnly swear and affirm, under penalty of perjury, that the contents of this document are the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth.

By: Iain Clifford

Iain Clifford

16th July Twenty Twenty-Five.

Witnesses

The undersigned witnesses hereby affirm that they personally observed Iain Clifford execute this affidavit, and that, to the best of their knowledge, the facts stated herein are true and accurate.

Witness 1

Proper Name: Andrew Michael

Signature: Andrew Michael Date: 16th July 2025 Witness 2

Proper Name: David Ayerst

Signature: David Ayerst

Date: 16th July 2025

Witness 3

Proper Name: Angela John

Signature: Angela John

Date: 16th July 2025

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I Iain Clifford, Certify the foregoing was provided by UK Special delivery mailed to:

Office of [KEIR STARMER] The Office of Prime Minister 10 Downing Street

London SW1A 2AA

Office of [KING CHARLES III]

The Office of the King Buckingham Palace London

SW1A 1AA

Office of [RICHARD HERMER] The Office of Attorney General 102 Petty France London SW1H 9EA

United Kingdom.

Office of [YVETTE COOPER]

The Office of Secretary of State 2 Marsham Street

London SW1P 4DF

Office of [ANDREW BAILEY] The Office Bank of England Threadneedle Street

London EC2R 8AH

Office of [NIKHIL RATHI]

The Office of Chief Executive of the Financial Conduct Authority 12 Endeavour Square

London E20 1JN

Judicial Conduct Investigations Office (JCIO)

Judicial Conduct Investigations Office 3rd Floor, 10 Victoria Street

London, SW1H 0NN

Serious Fraud Office (SFO) Office of Director [LISA OSOFSKY] Serious Fraud Office

2-4 Cockspur Street London, SW1Y 5BS

Financial Conduct Authority (FCA)

FAO: Complaints Team 12 Endeavour Square London, E20 1JN

FCA Complaints Commissioner Office of [ANTONY TOWNSEND]

Office of the Complaints Commissioner 1 Horse Guards Road

London, SW1A 2HQ

Office of [DEREK ANTHONY SWEETING]

Royal Courts of Justice Strand, London

WC2A 2LL

United Kingdom

Office of [ALASDAIR MACKENZIE]

The Office of Criminal Prosecutions Team Financial Conduct Authority 12 Endeavour Square

London E20 1JN

Office of [MATTHEW STONE] The Financial Conduct Authority 12 Endeavour Square

London E20 1JN

Office of [PIETRO BOFFA] The Financial Conduct Authority 12 Endeavour Square

London E20 1JN

Office of [ANTHONY BAUMGARTEN]

The Office of Southwark Crown Court 1 English Grounds.

Southwark London SE1 2HU

Office of [DAME SUSAN ELIZABETH CARR]

The Office of Judicial Conduct Investigations Office (JCIO) 81-82 Queen’s Building

Royal Courts of Justice Strand

London WC2A 2LL

Office of [SHABANA MAHMOOD]

The Office of the Ministry of Justice 102 Petty France London

SW1H 9AJ

Office of [NICK GOODWIN]

The Office of HM Courts and Tribunals Service (HMCTS) Post Point 1.10

102 Petty France London

SW1H 9AJ

Office of [DAME VICTORIA SHARP]

The office of the Royal Courts of Justice Strand

London WC2A 2LL

Office of [DAME SARAH ELIZABETH COCKERILL]

The Office of the Royal Courts of Justice Strand

London WC2A 2LL

As per Section 196(4) of the Law of Property Act 1925 (LPA 1925) provides that: “Any notice shall also be sufficiently served if it is served by registered post or recorded delivery by virtue of section 1 of the Recorded Delivery Service Act 1962” Furthermore: Under section 127(4) of the Postal Services Act 2000 (PSA 2000) and PSA 2000, Sch 8 Pt II, paras 2–3.