Fca V (Iain Clifford Stamp) Public Briefing Summary

FCA v IAIN CLIFFORD STAMP

Order 34/2023

Southwark Crown Court, In the Matter of FCA Application for Punishment.

NOTICE TO AGENT IS NOTICE TO PRINCIPAL NOTICE TO PRINCIPAL IS NOTICE TO AGENT

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

The pattern of conduct by the FCA, combined with judicial decisions by Judge [ANTHONY BAUMGARTNER] and Justice [DEREK SWEETING], suggests a pre-conceived strategy to incarcerate Iain Clifford the living man as presumed representative for [IAIN CLIFFORD STAMP] body corporate estate, for alleged contempt of Order 34/2023.

This order was impossible to comply with, and its enforcement appears designed to dismantle MATRIXFREEDOM and suppress lawful private activity.

The refusal to hear judicial review, the absence of jurisdictional proof, and the targeting of [IAIN CLIFFORD STAMP] body corporate estate and by association Iain Clifford raises serious concerns of collusion and abuse of process.

CASE SUMMARY

1. Jurisdiction Rebutted

  1. I lawfully appear only as the living man, not the corporate fiction. Jurisdiction has been rebutted through unrebutted affidavits and notices, removing all statutory presumptions.
  1. The occupant of the Office of General Executor of the decedent estate of [IAIN CLIFFORD STAMP] holds exclusive jurisdiction over the estate.
  1. The FCA and Southwark Crown Court, by initiating and continuing proceedings under Order 34/2023, are trespassing upon the estate without lawful authority.
  1. This constitutes a breach of fiduciary boundaries and unlawful interference with the administration of the estate.

2. Filed and Served Instruments

I have filed and served:

  1. Multiple affidavits
  2. Two motions to strike out
  3. A motion to stay proceedings
  4. Over 400 witness statements confirming no regulated services provided
  5. A conditional demand for stay
  6. Numerous covering letters

All have been lawfully served and publicly filed via Scribd and remain unrebutted.

3. FCA Misconduct and Lack of Standing

The FCA has failed to demonstrate that:

  1. [ALISTAIR MACKENZIE], [PIETRO BOFFA], and [MATTHEW STONE] are lawful agents under public oath or properly delegated.
  2. [MACKENZIE] appears to act while unregistered with the FCA, using an @fca.org.uk address.

This may constitute impersonation of public authority.

The FCA has engaged in malfeasance by pursuing enforcement without lawful standing, misrepresenting facts, and failing to disclose material information to the court.

4. No Regulated Activity Proven

400+ sworn statements from MATRIXFREEDOM PMA participants confirm:

  1. No FSMA-regulated activity occurred.
  2. All actions were private, lawful, and non-commercial.
  3. No injured parties or consumer complaints exist.

5. Defective Service Under CPR and FSMA

  1. Documents were sent to an unauthorized email address, violating:
  2. CPR 6.3, 6.23, 6.26
  3. Practice Direction 6A
  4. The substituted service application lacked full and frank disclosure.
  5. No compliance with FSMA 2000 Schedule 1.

6. Judicial and Constitutional Failures

The court has failed to:

  1. Produce Judge Anthony Baumgartner’s judicial oath (Promissory Oaths Act 1868).
  2. Confirm the existence of a Crown Agent.

These omissions render the proceedings ultra vires and constitutionally void.

7. UKITI v FCA Precedent

  1. In UK Innovative TI Ltd and Iain Clifford Stamp v FCA (Upper Tribunal, 2018), the FCA’s application was struck out for lack of jurisdiction. This evidences a pattern of prejudice and procedural overreach.

8. Motion to Stay Filed

A formal Motion to Stay Proceedings has been filed, demanding a pause until:

  1. The judge’s oath is produced.
  2. The Crown Agent is verified.
  3. FCA officers prove lawful standing and delegation.

Multiple motions to strike out have been filed and remain ignored, constituting a denial of due process.

9. Crown Liability

  1. All injuries, procedural harms, and financial damages caused by [IAIN CLIFFORD STAMP] body corporate estate are liabilities of the Crown. No lawful indemnity or delegation has been evidenced by the FCA.

10. Representation and Public Record

  1. Due to a credible fear of unlawful incarceration, I will not attend hearings in person.
    [DAVID AYERST] has been lawfully appointed as Attorney-in-Fact.
  2. All filings have been publicly published via Scribd for transparency.

11. Judicial Misconduct – Justice [DEREK SWEETING]

  1. Justice [SWEETING] dismissed a judicial review without a hearing.
    In 2023, he was reprimanded by the JCIO for delaying a judgment for over 14 months.
    This undermines judicial integrity and supports the claim of systemic failure.

12. Additional Harms and Legal Consequences

  1. £500,000 of MATRIXFREEDOM member funds were frozen under Order 34/2023.
  2. £400,000 of this was in physical gold at Bullion Vault in June 2023.
  3. The order forced liquidation into cash; gold has since surged in value, causing significant loss.
  4. Two UK companies associated with [IAIN CLIFFORD STAMP] were destroyed, with estimated damages of £3,000,000.
  5. All bank account associated with MATRIXFREEDOM were destroyed.
  6. Reputational damage and forced relocation to jurisdictions without UK extradition treaties.
  7. Diplomatic immunity as President of the Republic of Old Souls has been formally declared and ignored by the FCA and Southwark Crown Court, violating international law and the Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relations (1961).
  8. Order 34/2023 is declared a constructive trust, with Iain Clifford as beneficiary under the Cestui Que Vie framework.
  9. The beneficiary has instructed that the trust be collapsed as it provides no value, and its continuation constitutes trust fraud.
  10. All parties listed in the Certificate of Service are jointly and severally liable under the principle:

“Notice to agent is notice to principal; notice to principal is notice to agent.”

13. Consequences of Non-Compliance

  1. Unless Southwark Crown Court and the FCA stay the case and provide lawful proof of jurisdiction, a sheriff-led Common Law Court of Record will be convened.
  2. The wrongdoers will be put on trial before a jury of 12 peers to determine liability, fraud, and breach of fiduciary duty.
  3. This proceeding will be conducted under natural law and common law principles.

14. Demand for Public Inquiry

  1. The FCA’s repeated failure to establish lawful jurisdiction, its history of procedural misconduct, and the overwhelming evidence provided by over 400 sworn witness statements confirming no FSMA-regulated activity occurred, the Applicant demands a full and independent public inquiry into the following:
  1. Allegations of entrapment by design by the FCA;
  2. The FCA’s track record of abuse of its powers;
  3. The impersonation of public authority by FCA officers acting without proper delegation or oath;
  4. The systemic failure of the judiciary to address jurisdictional and procedural defects;
  5. The financial and reputational harm caused to MATRIXFREEDOM and its members.

No further proceedings should be permitted until the findings of this inquiry are made public and judicially reviewed.

NOTICE TO AGENT IS NOTICE TO PRINCIPAL NOTICE TO PRINCIPAL IS NOTICE TO AGENT

Office of [KEIR STARMER]

The Office of Prime Minister

10 Downing Street

London

SW1A 2AA

Office of [KING CHARLES III]

The Office of the King

Buckingham Palace

London

SW1A 1AA

Office of [DEREK ANTHONY SWEETING]

Royal Courts of Justice

Strand, London

WC2A 2LL

United Kingdom

Office of [RICHARD HERMER]

The Office of Attorney General

102 Petty France

London

SW1H 9EA

United Kingdom.

Office of [YVETTE COOPER]

The Office of Secretary of State

2 Marsham Street

London

SW1P 4DF

Office of [ANDREW BAILEY]

The Office Bank of England

Threadneedle Street

London

EC2R 8AH

Office of [NIKHIL RATHI]

The Office of Chief Executive of the Financial Conduct Authority

12 Endeavour Square

London

E20 1JN

Office of [ALISDAIR MACKENZIE]

The Office of Criminal Prosecutions Team Financial Conduct Authority

12 Endeavour Square

London

E20 1JN

Office of [MATTHEW STONE]

The Financial Conduct Authority

12 Endeavour Square

London

E20 1JN

Office of [PIETRO BOFFA]

The Financial Conduct Authority

12 Endeavour Square

London

E20 1JN

Office of [ANTHONY BAUMGARTEN]

The Office of Southwark Crown Court

1 English Grounds.

Southwark

London

SE1 2HU

Office of [DAME SUSAN ELIZABETH CARR]

The Office of Judicial Conduct Investigations Office (JCIO)

81-82 Queen’s Building

Royal Courts of Justice

Strand

London

WC2A 2LL

Office of [SHABANA MAHMOOD]

The Office of the Ministry of Justice

102 Petty France

London

SW1H 9AJ

Office

Office of [NICK GOODWIN]

The Office of HM Courts and Tribunals Service (HMCTS)

Post Point 1.10

102 Petty France

London

SW1H 9AJ

Office of [DAME VICTORIA SHARP]

The office of the Royal Courts of Justice

Strande

London

WC2A 2LL

Office of [DAME SARAH ELIZABETH COCKERILL]

The Office of the Royal Courts of Justice

Strand

London

WC2A 2LL

As per Section 196(4) of the Law of Property Act 1925 (LPA 1925) provides that: “Any notice shall also be sufficiently served if it is served by registered post or recorded delivery by virtue of section 1 of the Recorded Delivery Service Act 1962” Furthermore: Under section 127(4) of the Postal Services Act 2000 (PSA 2000) and PSA 2000, Sch 8 Pt II, paras 2–3.

Please fill out the form fields below to request an interview with Iain Clifford.