MOTION TWO TO STAY PROCEEDINGS
NOTICE TO AGENT IS NOTICE TO PRINCIPAL NOTICE TO PRINCIPAL IS NOTICE TO AGENT
Order 34 2023
IN THE SOUTHWARK CROWN COURT
In the Matter of Order 34 2023 and FCA Application for Punishment
- I, Iain Clifford, hereby move this Honourable Court to immediately stay all proceedings in the above-captioned matter on an emergency basis, pending resolution of the following unrebutted and unresolved issues:
- Multiple affidavits and notices have been served upon the Court and the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA), including but not limited to:
- Affidavit Denial of Jurisdiction
- Denial of Service
- Malfeasance and Breach of Oath
- Appointment of Attorney-in-Fact
- Judicial Notice of Fraud Upon the Court
- In excess of 400 witness statements affirming no regulated services have ever been performed
- Two strike out motions
- Conditional Demand for Stay of Proceedings
- These remain unrebutted and stand as truth in commerce.
- The FCA has failed to establish lawful jurisdiction, failed to provide evidence of lawful service, and failed to rebut the claim that no FSMA-regulated activities were performed.
- The FCA and specifically Alastair Mackenzie have brought fraud on the court and have not presented any evidence of lawful standing.
- The presiding judge has not disclosed a judicial oath as required under the Promissory Oaths Act 1868, and no Crown Agent has been identified at Southwark Crown Court.
- I will not appear as a living man under God’s law in any court of administration even pro se for fear of unlawful incarceration.
- I have appointed an Attorney-in-Fact and has declared that he will not appear in a court of administration acting upon the corporate fiction convened under administrative or statutory jurisdiction, as such courts do not have lawful authority over the living man. This position is supported by the principle that jurisdiction must be proven, not presumed, and by the maxim of law:
- “Consent makes the law. A contract is a law between the parties, which can acquire force only by consent.” — Bouvier’s Maxims of Law
- If the stay is not granted, the matter will be immediately referred to Judicial Review under Part 54 of the Civil Procedure Rules. Should that avenue be obstructed or denied, the Applicant will escalate the matter to the European Court of Human Rights under Article 6 (Right to a Fair Trial) and Article 13 (Right to an Effective Remedy) of the European Convention on Human Rights.
- I reserve the right to convene a Sheriff-appointed Common Law Court with a jury of his peers and will hold all wrongdoers accountable. In such a court, constables acting as peacekeepers may enforce lawful arrest under the authority of natural and common law.
- I affirm that the actions of the Financial Conduct Authority and the Southwark Crown Court are being closely observed by thousands of members of the MATRIXFREEDOM Private Members Association. All filings, affidavits, and correspondence are being made part of the public record and published transparently via Scribd and other public platforms. A documentary will be made that names and shames all parties to this fraud and travesty of justice. This ensures third-party witness, accountability, and lawful transparency in all matters concerning these proceedings.
- ADDITIONAL GROUND FOR STAY
- I further demand that all proceedings be stayed until the conclusion of a full and independent public inquiry into the conduct of the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA), including but not limited to:
- Allegations of entrapment by design;
- The FCA’s track record of abuse of its powers;
- The submission of over 400 sworn witness statements confirming that no FSMA-regulated activities were performed by the Applicant or any MATRIXFREEDOM member;
- Procedural misconduct, impersonation, and misrepresentation of authority by FCA agents;
- The FCA’s failure to establish lawful jurisdiction or prosecutorial authority.
- This inquiry is essential to ensure transparency, accountability, and the integrity of the judicial process. No further proceedings should be permitted until the findings of this inquiry are made public and judicially reviewed.
- RELIEF SOUGHT
WHEREFORE, the Applicant respectfully demands that this Honourable Court:
- Immediately stay all proceedings in this matter pending lawful resolution of jurisdictional and procedural defects.
- Acknowledge the unrebutted affidavits and notices as binding and conclusive.
- Prevent any issuance of arrest warrants or further administrative actions until lawful authority is established.
Fraud voids all it touches. Due process is not optional. And authority must be proven, not presumed.
Respectfully submitted,
By: Iain Clifford
Iain Clifford
25th Day June Twenty Twenty-Five.
Correspondence Address
Occupant of the Office of General Executor
4c Glebe Park Avenue
Bedhampton
Havant
Hampshire PO9 3JR
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I Iain Clifford, Certify the foregoing was provided by UK Special delivery mailed to:
Office of [KEIR STARMER]
The Office of Prime Minister
10 Downing Street
London
SW1A 2AA
Office of [KING CHARLES III]
The Office of the King
Buckingham Palace
London
SW1A 1AA
Office of [DEREK ANTHONY SWEETING]
Royal Courts of Justice
Strand, London
WC2A 2LL
United Kingdom
Office of [RICHARD HERMER]
The Office of Attorney General
102 Petty France
London
SW1H 9EA
United Kingdom.
Office of [YVETTE COOPER]
The Office of Secretary of State
2 Marsham Street
London
SW1P 4DF
Office of [ANDREW BAILEY]
The Office Bank of England
Threadneedle Street
London
EC2R 8AH
Office of [NIKHIL RATHI]
The Office of Chief Executive of the Financial Conduct Authority
12 Endeavour Square
London
E20 1JN
Office of [ALISTAIR MACKENZIE]
The Office of Criminal Prosecutions Team Financial Conduct Authority
12 Endeavour Square
London
E20 1JN
Office of [MATTHEW STONE]
The Financial Conduct Authority
12 Endeavour Square
London
E20 1JN
Office of [PIETRO BOFFA]
The Financial Conduct Authority
12 Endeavour Square
London
E20 1JN
Office of [ANTHONY BAUMGARTEN]
The Office of Southwark Crown Court
1 English Grounds.
Southwark
London
SE1 2HU
Office of [DAME SUSAN ELIZABETH CARR]
The Office of Judicial Conduct Investigations Office (JCIO)
81-82 Queen’s Building
Royal Courts of Justice
Strand
London
WC2A 2LL
Office of [SHABANA MAHMOOD]
The Office of the Ministry of Justice
102 Petty France
London
SW1H 9AJ
Office
Office of [NICK GOODWIN]
The Office of HM Courts and Tribunals Service (HMCTS)
Post Point 1.10
102 Petty France
London
SW1H 9AJ
Office of [DAME VICTORIA SHARP]
The office of the Royal Courts of Justice
Strande
London
WC2A 2LL
Office of [DAME SARAH ELIZABETH COCKERILL]
The Office of the Royal Courts of Justice
Strand
London
WC2A 2LL
As per Section 196(4) of the Law of Property Act 1925 (LPA 1925) provides that: “Any notice shall also be sufficiently served if it is served by registered post or recorded delivery by virtue of section 1 of the Recorded Delivery Service Act 1962” Furthermore: Under section 127(4) of the Postal Services Act 2000 (PSA 2000) and PSA 2000, Sch 8 Pt II, paras 2–3.
