NOTICE OF REJECTION AND LAWFUL NON-CONSENT TO SENTENCE UNDER ORDER 34 2023


NOTICE OF REJECTION AND LAWFUL NON-CONSENT TO SENTENCE UNDER ORDER 34/2023

NOTICE TO AGENT IS NOTICE TO PRINCIPAL

NOTICE TO PRINCIPAL IS NOTICE TO AGENT


 

IN THE MATTER OF: The Financial Conduct Authority v Iain Clifford Stamp
COURT: Southwark Crown Court
JUDGE: Anthony Baumgartner
DATE OF SENTENCE: 30 July 2025

To:

  • Judge Anthony Baumgartner
  • Financial Conduct Authority (FAO: Nikhil Rathi, CEO)
  • Office of the Attorney General
  • Other Crown Operatives

NOTICE OF REJECTION AND LAWFUL NON-CONSENT TO SENTENCE

I, Iain Clifford, a living man, General Executor of the Estate known as IAIN CLIFFORD STAMP, and President of the sovereign ecclesiastical ministry known as the Republic of Old Souls, hereby give formal NOTICE OF REJECTION of the sentencing judgment delivered by Judge Anthony Baumgartner on 30 July 2025 at Southwark Crown Court.

This sentence is unlawful, void ab initio, and rejected for cause on the following non-exhaustive grounds:

  1. No Lawful Prosecutor Identified:
    The entity “Alastair Mackenzie” has never been lawfully verified as a prosecutor under the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002 (POCA), the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000 (FSMA), or any enabling legislation. No delegation, authority, or appointment was ever evidenced, despite multiple formal demands. Judge Baumgartner has acted ultra vires in proceeding to sentencing without lawful prosecution.
  2. No Consent to Jurisdiction or Service:
    All addresses for service have been rescinded and formalised by sworn affidavit. The court has persisted in assuming jurisdiction where none was consented to and service has been made unlawfully and without rebuttal to numerous formal notices.
  3. Fraudulent Constructive Trust:
    The judgment and sentence are a continuation of a constructive trust fraud, wherein the Court has presumed the role of beneficiary over the Estate of the living man without lawful standing. I, as Executor, deny and rebut all joinder.
  4. Violation of Peaceful Mission and Ecclesiastical Standing:
    This sentence constitutes a direct violation of my ecclesiastical office, mission of peace, and my capacity as diplomatic envoy for the Republic of Old Souls, a sovereign 508(c)(1)(A) church ministry. Continued interference constitutes a breach of international law and Article 9 of the ECHR.
  5. Breach of Articles 6, 8, 10, 13, 17, and 18 of the European Convention on Human Rights, as well as Protocol 1 Article 1 regarding deprivation of property and liberty without lawful cause.
  6. Criminal Collusion and Conspiracy to Pervert the Course of Justice:
    The continued refusal to acknowledge affidavits, notices, jurisdictional rebuttals, or the absence of lawful prosecution suggests deliberate collusion between the FCA and the judiciary. These actions form the basis for international criminal prosecution under the Rome Statute, for persecution, unlawful imprisonment, and systemic targeting of a whistleblower.
  7. Factual Rebuttal to Allegation of Asset Dissipation
  1. The sentencing judgment alleges that approximately $320,000 USD was dissipated over a 15-month period in breach of the Restraint Order. This assertion is categorically false and constitutes a material fabrication by the Court.
  2. Following the issuance of Order 34/2023 in June 2023, every known bank account and asset associated with the Estate of IAIN CLIFFORD STAMP was effectively frozen. This includes, but is not limited to, multiple UK bank accounts and the BullionVault holdings. These accounts have remained frozen continuously since that date, with no lawful or unlawful access or transactions permitted.
  3. It is therefore factually and legally impossible for any dissipation of assets to have occurred post-June 2023. The Court has provided no evidentiary basis or transactional audit trail to support the claim of $320,000 in dissipation. No itemized list of expenditures, account statements, or forensic accounting has been disclosed.
  4. This false allegation undermines the integrity of the sentencing judgment and further evidences the prejudicial and assumptive nature of the proceedings. It also constitutes a breach of Article 6 of the ECHR, as it relies on unsubstantiated claims without affording the accused an opportunity to rebut with evidence.
  5. This rebuttal is hereby incorporated into the formal rejection of the sentence and shall be submitted as part of the evidentiary record to the European Court of Human Rights and the International Criminal Court.
  1. Attendance and Attorney-in-Fact
  1. It is hereby stated for the record that I, Iain Clifford, the living man, am not obliged to attend any administrative court hearing.
  2. In accordance with my lawful rights, I appointed David Ayerst as my attorney-in-fact to attend the hearing, record the facts, and request and require a court of record.
  3. This lawful appointment was denied by Judge Anthony Baumgartner, who proceeded to remove my attorney-in-fact from the court, thereby denying my right to representation and record.
  4. This action further evidences the prejudicial and unlawful nature of the proceedings and supports the rejection of the sentence as void ab initio.
  1. Challenge to the Lawfulness of Order 34/2023
  1. Order 34/2023 is hereby challenged as unlawful on the grounds that the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) has never provided any evidence that Iain Clifford Stamp or any individual associated with Matrix Freedom has conducted financial services that require a license under the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000 or any other regulatory framework.
  2. Despite repeated demands and the submission of over 500 witness statements to Southwark Crown Court, which affirm that no such financial services were ever offered, the FCA has failed to rebut this evidence.
  3. Matrix Freedom is a private members association, operating lawfully outside the scope of public financial regulation. Furthermore, Iain Clifford is a minister of the Republic of Old Souls, a 508(c)(1)(A) ecclesiastical ministry, and does not engage in any commercial or regulated financial activity that would require licensing.
  4. The continued reliance on Order 34/2023 in the absence of evidentiary foundation constitutes a breach of due process, a denial of natural justice, and a violation of Articles 6 and 9 of the European Convention on Human Rights.
  1. Rebuttal of Judicial Characterization of Affidavits and Notices
  1. The sentencing judgment repeatedly refers to my affidavits and notices served on all parties at the Crown Court as “nonsensical” and lacking foundation under the law. This characterization is categorically false, disrespectful, and dishonourable.
  2. My affidavits and notices are expertly written, grounded in relevant Acts, statutes, and lawful principles. They are constructed with precision and lawful intent, and have been served in accordance with due process and lawful notice procedures.
  3. The judge’s dismissal of these documents without substantive engagement or rebuttal undermines the integrity of the court and constitutes a breach of Article 6 of the European Convention on Human Rights, which guarantees the right to a fair hearing and consideration of evidence.
  4. This rebuttal is hereby incorporated into the formal rejection of the sentence and shall be submitted as part of the evidentiary record to the European Court of Human Rights and the International Criminal Court.

LAWFUL STANDING AND NEXT STEPS:

I reserve all rights, remedies, and immunities under customary international law, ecclesiastical law, and the European Convention on Human Rights.

This notice is being submitted as an official addendum to both:

  • My ECHR Application under Article 34
  • My ICC Communication under Article 15 of the Rome Statute

Service is acknowledged as evidence of your continuing liability and complicity in these violations.

Signed,

Iain Clifford
General Executor of the Estate: IAIN CLIFFORD STAMP
President, Republic of Old Souls
Date: 31st July 2025

Location: North Cyprus

JURAT

I Iain Clifford, holding the office of General Executor of the [IAIN CLIFFORD STAMP] estate, a divine (holy) living spirit, born again, incarnate with life as a man under God’s law, attest and affirm that the aforementioned is true and correct, attested to and submitted by a living, breathing, self-aware man, under God. I further acknowledge that this is an act of my free will and Deed.

I solemnly swear and affirm, under penalty of perjury, that the contents of this document are the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth.

By: Iain Clifford

Iain Clifford

31st July Twenty Twenty-Five.

Witnesses

The undersigned witnesses hereby affirm that they personally observed Iain Clifford execute this affidavit, and that, to the best of their knowledge, the facts stated herein are true and accurate.

Witness 1

Proper Name: Andrew Michael

Signature: Andrew Michael

Date: 31st July 2025

Witness 2

Proper Name: David Ayerst

Signature: David Ayerst

Date: 31st July 2025

Witness 3

Proper Name: Angela John

Signature: Angela John

Date: 31st July 2025

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I Iain Clifford, Certify the foregoing was provided by UK Special delivery mailed to:

Office of [KEIR STARMER]
The Office of Prime Minister
10 Downing Street
London
SW1A 2AA

Office of [KING CHARLES III]
The Office of the King
Buckingham Palace
London
SW1A 1AA

Office of [RICHARD HERMER]
The Office of Attorney General
102 Petty France
London
SW1H 9EA
United Kingdom.

Office of [YVETTE COOPER]
The Office of Secretary of State
2 Marsham Street
London
SW1P 4DF

Office of [ANDREW BAILEY]
The Office Bank of England
Threadneedle Street
London
EC2R 8AH

Office of [NIKHIL RATHI]
The Office of Chief Executive of the Financial Conduct Authority
12 Endeavour Square
London
E20 1JN

Judicial Conduct Investigations Office (JCIO)
Judicial Conduct Investigations Office
3rd Floor, 10 Victoria Street
London, SW1H 0NN

Serious Fraud Office (SFO)
Office of Director [LISA OSOFSKY]
Serious Fraud Office
2-4 Cockspur Street
London, SW1Y 5BS

Financial Conduct Authority (FCA)
FAO: Complaints Team
12 Endeavour Square
London, E20 1JN

FCA Complaints Commissioner Office of [ANTONY TOWNSEND]
Office of the Complaints Commissioner
1 Horse Guards Road
London, SW1A 2HQ

Office of [DEREK ANTHONY SWEETING]
Royal Courts of Justice
Strand, London
WC2A 2LL
United Kingdom

Office of [ALASTAIR MACKENZIE]
The Office of Criminal Prosecutions Team Financial Conduct Authority
12 Endeavour Square
London
E20 1JN

Office of [MATTHEW STONE]
The Financial Conduct Authority
12 Endeavour Square
London
E20 1JN

Office of [PIETRO BOFFA]
The Financial Conduct Authority
12 Endeavour Square
London
E20 1JN

Office of [ANTHONY BAUMGARTEN]
The Office of Southwark Crown Court
1 English Grounds.
Southwark
London
SE1 2HU

Office of [DAME SUSAN ELIZABETH CARR]
The Office of Judicial Conduct Investigations Office (JCIO)
81-82 Queen’s Building
Royal Courts of Justice
Strand
London
WC2A 2LL

Office of [SHABANA MAHMOOD]
The Office of the Ministry of Justice

102 Petty France
London
SW1H 9AJ

Office of [NICK GOODWIN]
The Office of HM Courts and Tribunals Service (HMCTS)
Post Point 1.10
102 Petty France
London
SW1H 9AJ

Office of [DAME VICTORIA SHARP]
The office of the Royal Courts of Justice
Strand
London
WC2A 2LL

Office of [DAME SARAH ELIZABETH COCKERILL]
The Office of the Royal Courts of Justice
Strand
London
WC2A 2LL

As per Section 196(4) of the Law of Property Act 1925 (LPA 1925) provides that: “Any notice shall also be sufficiently served if it is served by registered post or recorded delivery by virtue of section 1 of the Recorded Delivery Service Act 1962” Furthermore: Under section 127(4) of the Postal Services Act 2000 (PSA 2000) and PSA 2000, Sch 8 Pt II, paras 2–3.

Please fill out the form fields below to request an interview with Iain Clifford.